Classes Universities Should be Teaching in CS Programs

Dan Zambonini published an article on what he thought would be useful classes in computer science programs in colleges and universities.

To Mr. Zambonini’s credit, I can relate to most of this suggestions. My brother told me most of his CS classes at Purdue University are heavy on theory, light on practice. I had to really squeeze practicing PHP out of him. Fortunately the classes I am taking at UCSC are really market driven and practical (Java + XML, JavaScripting, Securing Java… etc). But being able to get into one of those classes is another story.

via [Slashdot]

And the Growth Continues…

I noticed that Bryan is now able to stay focused on the mobile over his crib for 15 minutes or more each time. Before this week, it was tough to get him interested in something for more than 5 or more minutes. Sometimes he also tries to talk to the animals on the mobile.

Another new development is that when he’s on his tummy, he’s now able to hold his head up for a lot longer than he could before last week.

He also smiles a lot when talked to. I guess when he hears something he likes, he gives this big smiles, sometimes even chuckles.

Other related new developments include the ability to follow a person with his eyes, and when that person moves beyond his sight, he is able to turn his head to track the moving person. He’s also staying up a lot longer during the day and sleeping slightly longer during the night (thank god). I can’t wait to have him sleep for at least 6 hours at a time (and hopefully through the night).

詠熙現在漸漸的開始可以在同一個東西上集中注意力超過十五分鐘了。一個禮拜前要他花五分鐘看個東西的話, 他才不會屌你勒。現在他也可以趴著然後抬頭東張西望的到處看。之前他的脖子軟啪啪的, 根本支撐不了他那顆大頭。

還有就是現在可以逗他笑了。他對他喜歡聽的聲音會笑的特別開心。不要說什麼, 有時候他連做夢都會哈哈大笑。我們萬萬也想不到才五, 六個禮拜的新生兒竟然會笑。我媽明明說我們這一帶的小孩都要到三四個月才會開始笑ㄟ。難道這是人類進化的寫真嘛?

其他關於詠熙的進展包括: 他現在也可以用眼睛跟著人晃來晃去的。象現在我們走到哪他的眼睛就會跟到哪 — 超酷的。而且如果你走到他的眼線之外, 他還知道要轉頭呢! 從這禮拜開始, 我們也漸漸的發現詠熙白天清醒的時間越來越長了。不知道哪時他才可以晚上最起碼一口氣睡上個五六個小時啊。

New Orleans — The Untold Stories from NPR

What is America going to do without NPR?

Sitting in my car during lunch break, I was listening to This American Life, a weekly program aired every Saturday on NPR. I am glad I caught the first two acts of the program. These are the stories the American mass media never bothered to investigate and report.

The first act was about a woman’s expericne at the New Orleans Convention Center. Other than describing just how terrible the conditions were there, she also shared other stories relating to the situation. The mass media (CNN, NBC, Fox News… etc) has been reporting that some looters were gang members taking advantage of the lawlessness in New Orleans. But what the mass media failed to uncover was what really happened with the looted goods!

The woman described that the only people who were looking after the sick, elderly and women with children were none other than the gang members with guns. Those gang members organized themselves and took on responsibilities to patrol various areas of the Convention Center and made sure that people were being cared for. They looted food, water and juice for children and the elderly. They also wore yellow raincoats so that they could be easily recognized for assistance.

Sounds like they were more organized than any local or Federal law/emergency agencies. It throws a different spin on the phrase “organized crime”.

The second act of the program was about a paramedic who was in New Orleans for a convention. She told of a story of how her group of people were repeatedly lied to about the rescue buses that never showed up by different police agencies (just to get them off of their backs). Worst yet, when they tried to cross a bridge to go to a neighboring town for shelter, the Sheriff Department of that town had already set up a blockade at the bottom of the bridge to stop refugees from seeking shelter in their town.

The Sheriff told them, “I am not going to let our town turn into another Super Dome”. Translation: If you are poor or black, back off. Worst yet, the Sheriffs were pointing their guns at the people and firing warning shots in the air to fend the refugees from crossing the bridge. Later, the woman and her friends went to a different highway to setup temporary shelter. Yet another Sheriff came screaming and ordered them to get off the bridge. Shortly after, a police helicopter came and flew just low enough to the ground to make sure everything was blown away from the camp so that they couldn’t stay. WTF! Assholes. Yeah, “racism-is-not-an-issue” my ass.

All we heard from the mass media is that police were shot at. But now this gave me a different perspective as to why they were. I wonder why the mass media is not picking up stories like this. Instead, it is infacuated with the sensationalism of the politics and the material destruction of the hurricane. Isn’t journalism about investigating the truth from all perspectives?

In many ways, some police officers are really jackasses to begin with. They don’t act like the public servants they were sworn to be. They act more like bullies with a license. They are rude, mean and impolite (ones I have seen and dealt with… not to mention all the stories I have heard from friends and relatives). And oh, don’t forget that 60% of the New Orleans police force who abandoned their posts. Some servants of the public, huh?

中午下課在車上吃午餐的時候, 美國國家公共廣播電台正好在播放 “美國生活週記” 的節目。節目的第一段講到一個婦女在紐奧良會展中心所經歷的一切。最令我覺得感慨的是, 在社會秩序的大亂之下, 幫忙維持秩序的反倒不是所謂人民保姆的警察, 而是平時人人又怕又恨的流氓和小混混。這些混混團結起來輪流巡邏會展中心。掠奪回來的贓物不但不是自己留用, 反而是將所有民生用品公平分發給老人和小孩。這些都是美國媒體新聞不可能花時間和經歷來調查的故事。當地方和聯邦政府都對暴風留下後的災難不知所措的時候, 這些流氓都已義務信的做了這些政府機構該做的工作。

另一段故事是講到警察。另一個婦女和她的朋友想跨過一條連接鄰鎮的公路逃難, 但想不到連公路都還沒上就被一隊鄰鎮的警察在槍口下攔了下來。這警察的其中用意是不希望這些窮困的黑人到多數為白人的地方。後來這些人令外找了一個沒有人的公路搭棚等待救援, 但是想不到又有一堆警察用槍指著強硬他們離開。不久後來了台直升機在半空中故意把他們搭棚的用具等全部吹走以確定這些人不會逗留下來。

什麼世界嘛…. 一場大風吹走了美國掩蓋已久的種族歧視醜象。一場風把隱藏在警察內在的流氓吹翻了, 但卻也把流氓淺在的道德心吹了出來…

A Chinese Commonwealth

I stumbled onto an essay (Chinese version here) on a proposal to best mend the tension in the Taiwan Straight by Taiwan’s National Policy Foundation. The heart of the essay is a proposal made by the NPF to reunite China and Taiwan under a concept pioneered by the British Empire, a Chinese Commonwealth.

The idea is that commonwealth nations behave as independently run and governed countries. They have the rights of an autonomous nation. However, under the umbrella of the commonwealth, these nations are actually “nation states” that pledge their ultimate allegiance to one power (in the case of the British Commonwealth, the Queen). The paper argues that, with this arrangement, Taiwan would retain all of its autonomy while enjoying one-nation status with China. Taiwan would be free to negotiate its own treaties, appoint its own ambassadors, regulate its trade and hold elections without interference from China, just like Great Britain does not interfere with any of its commonwealth nations (Canada, Australia, Malaysia… etc).

The paper also revealed that China had already considered such possibility back in 1997 when its supreme leader, Deng Xiaoping was still alive. But Taiwan had always held the position that unless China became demarcated, reunification wouldn’t be possible. The relationship with China worsened when a pro-independence president, Chen Shui-bien was elected (twice!).

Many scholars believe that the next century is going to be the Chinese century. And the reunification of China and Taiwan is going to be a key element in strengthening that position. Personally, I think Taiwan would be silly to go it alone in the next 50 years. Its people has the insight, cultural similarity and language to play a decisive role in being an active participant of the next economic wave through the success of China.

今天在電視上看到台灣的立委雷倩到美國來訪問。她在灣區一個華人電視上談到個蠻有趣的東西, 就是 “中華國協”。其實這當中的精髓是直接向大英帝國時期沿留下的 “大英國協” 作為樣本。後來上網找了一下才發現這玩意兒是由連戰啟辦的財團法人國家政策研究基金會所發表的一篇論文。其中提到了一些兩岸統一後的假設及建議。

論文中提到如果以國協的方式統一, 台灣就可保有它現在的自主權, 甚至可以以國協的方式申請加入聯合國。國協的前提當然就是一國兩制。就像英國現在也從來不會介管加拿大, 澳洲或馬來西亞等國協聯盟的任何大小國事。雖然這些國家名義上都已是有自主權的獨立國, 他們最終效忠的還是英國的皇后。

我覺得台獨這東西太不為台灣兩千多萬的人民著想了。台獨對台灣一點好處都沒有。雖然大陸和台灣的文化和習俗上的確是入差很大, 但是回頭想想, 美國東, 中, 西岸也都有不小的差別… 更別提到北部和南部的差異了。所以以一個大國來講, 也許這是無法改變的形態。人家都說在不久的將來會是中國人的世紀。在這時候搞台獨未免也太不會挑時間了吧… 台灣在大陸有他國沒有的優勢, 包括語言, 文化, 背景等等都把台灣的人民擺在這個中國人世紀改革的最前線。如果時機錯過了, 台灣在百年後可能連在教科書上也只能當附註罷了。

FreeBSD and Stuff

FreeBSD Ever since Kyung got me sign up for Linode, my love affairs with Linux has been steady. At first it was Fedora, then came Slackware, then boldly, I tried the hottest newcomer, Gentoo. It was the fun days of using a VPS to reinstall pretty much anything at any time with just 10 minutes or less. At the end, I settled with Slackware before moving on to ServerBeach for a dedicated server running Debian.

All is well with Linux, but then my cousin, Alex, started planting ideas about FreeBSD in my head (how it’s even closer to a true Unix system and that some of the most popular sites are powered by FreeBSD). At my last job interview with Vicarious Visions, I learned that a lot of their servers are also running on FreeBSD, and plus Mac OSX’s Darwin is based on FreeBSD anyway, I thought it’d worth my time to look into it.

Ever since I lost my job in January, I have had some time in my hands to educate myself on some stuff. But I feel like no matter how much I teach myself, the knowledge is not quite as valuable as if it was applied to realproblems in the field. Hopefully whatever I learned from FreeBSD will help me land my next job, whatever that may be.

I did a quick and dirty install (easier than Slackware, not quite near Fedora’s ease of use though). We’ll see what happens.

其實我在各種不同的 Linux 上花了不少心思去研究和摸索。當然如果在家裡自己一個一個版本的慢慢安裝就太浪費時間了, 還好 Kyung 之前有介紹我用 VPS (虛擬專屬伺服器), 在 VPS 上換裝任何 Linux 版本只要十分鐘! 所以前前後後試了不少種類, 分別有 Fedora, Slackware, Gentoo 和 Debian 等。但是最後還是用 Debian (ServerBeach 只有 Redhat 和 Debian 的選擇)。

後來祝平不斷的向我宣導 FreeBSD 的好處, 說他同學架的站幾乎清一色都是用 FreeBSD çš„… 剛好上上個禮拜去面試那家公司也有不少台 FreeBSD 的伺服器, 我今天心血來潮就試裝了。還好安裝的過程還算簡單 (比 Slackware ç°¡å–®, 但還是沒有 Fedora 好裝就是了)。

Moving Images of Bryan

Yes, they are here. I finally got around to publish video clips of Bryan. Visit bryan.wiredatom.com and click on the video link there (Quicktime 7.0 required). You won’t be disappointed.

花了一段時間整理後, 詠熙的 video 隆重登場了。請到 bryan.wiredatom.com, 然後按 「Video Clips」即可。到了 video 網頁後, 只要在照片上按一下就可以看了喔! 不過提醒大家要下載蘋果最新的 Quicktime 7.0 才可以放影喔。

看來可能以後要多多用雙語來部落格才能照顧到在台灣的親戚朋友們…

🙂

Music, Lots of Music

Su-fei told Grace she’d downloaded some children’s music for Bryan and that she’d burn some CDs for him the next time she came over. Cool, I thought. She probably got a couple dozen children’s songs or something.

This morning I woke up to a piece of music by Mozart (kinda like Eddie Murphy at the beginning of his 1998 movie, “Coming to America“). Sweet! Then I discoverd a freakin Hello Kitty packet full of discs with tons of children’s music, each one with printed labels of the disc title and name of the songs. What the….

Grace said Su-fei had gone through the trouble of making each disc. That’s a total of 140 songs. Wow! Thanks, Su-fei.

Now I am re-importing everything back into iTunes so that we can put them on iPod for centralisation purposes. It’s also a good thing that my car stereo is MP3-ready so that I can just put everything on one disc for Bryan.

Some researchers claim (here, here and here) that classical music can help babies become healthier and smarter. It may or may not be true. But this is one of those wishful thinkings where you don’t want to risk the opposite. Kalpana (sorry, no picture yet) said that when her daughter Kishoree was born, she listened to classical music a lot. At age of six now (as of August 25th), Kishoree is among the smartest six-year-olds I know (it’s not like I know many). I am sure parent’s influence in education and discipline (besides just the music) probably has a lot more to do with her intelligence and being so articulate with language and manners. But it’s been said that the music stimulates infant’s brain to start getting those billions of neurons (3x the number of adults) to work their ass off.

Good stuff. Thanks to Su-fei again. And let’s not forget to thank those great dead Austrian musicians. And just by association of nationality, thanks to you too, Birgit.

前幾天舒菲告訴葛瑞絲說他下載了一些兒歌要給詠熙聽。本來以為大概就幾首像 “小蜜蜂“ 之類的東西, 結果想不到她燒十片的 CD, 而且每一片還有加印歌曲名稱和順序… 這時候我只能說一句廣東話: “ho sai lei ah!”

人家說給嬰兒多聽音樂 (尤其是古典歐洲音樂) 可以刺激腦部發展, 促進腦部發育… 也不知道是真是假, 反正就給他聽了就是了。

Happy One-Month Anniversary

One month down, 17 years and 11 months to go. Yoohoo!

It was Bryan’s one-month anniversary (is this grammar even right?) on Sept. 1st. We held a party yesterday in his honor (but it was really an excuse for the adults to chit chat). Over 30 people showed up according to Grace’s count. Thanks to mom’s cooking and Grace’s organization, everybody was fed well and happy to have seen Bryan.

Not to loose face, Bryan was up for a long time yesterday “entertaining” guests. I think almost every single adult have held Bryan for at least once. What joy.

Republicans and Education

New York Times reported (free registration required) the U.S. Department of Education conducted a research to see if bilingual education benefits non-English speaking children to learn English better. Unfortunately the DOE has refused to publish the findings of the data due to the political sensitivity of the issue.

The study, which has been talked about for years, is still not out. But it is known that the researchers conclude that bilingual education is helpful to those learning English. That conflicts with the views of some powerful Republicans and conservatives who view such programs as useless or downright harmful.

Wait a minute… What data does the politicians have to back up their claims? Why don’t they just leave the researchers alone and publish the data independently? This reminds me of earlier controversies on Bush Science and global climate change and how the Republican (specifically Bush) White House tempers with scientific data to suit its own political agenda. Sounds familiar? Wasn’t the Iraqi War started by such information manipulation?

President Clinton faced impeachment hearings over a personal matter. How come the Democrats are sitting on their asses on the biggest con artist/liar of the American political history?

Bush may be a jackass, but the Democrats are truly cowards. They should really collect their balls strengths and look into impeaching Bush for all his wrong doings (which is clearly harming the country). And this would be the perfect time to do it since his popularity is now at its all time low. But then again, maybe they just want to get things done and not get caught up with all the sensationalism of impeaching the biggest moron of all time.

Here’s another thing, whenever there’s something to do with poor or minorities, the Republican politicians are almost always against it in modern America. How come people still keep voting for them? Does that really reflect the views of Americans as a whole? Or does this mean all those elections have been fixed? It’s f*cked up if the answer to either question is true.