Archive for March, 2006

Steve’s Play Ground

Saturday, March 25th, 2006

Sometimes being stubborn can really pay off big time, especially if you have the will to drive that stubbornness through walls. Steve Jobs did just that and then some.

Murdza reminded me of an article that Vanityfair is running on Steve Jobs and the 30th anniversary of Apple Computer. It’s a pretty long read with lots of comparative analysis to modern cultural icons. I was also surprised by the in-depth disection of the author’s keen observation on the trend o the tech/gadget industry in general…

An excerpt:

One counter-intuitive aspect of Jobs’s media sensibility is that it’s had little to do with content, that great sentimental area of media concern, and everything to do with hardware—the thing that nobody in the American media business has wanted to have anything to do with for two generations. Steve is really an appliance-maker.

And a stubborn one. For most of his career, the rap has been that Jobs missed out on greatness and ubiquity ecause he insisted, unlike the folks at Microsoft, on tying his software to his machines. Perversely, it didn’t seem to matter to him, or even so much to register with him, that, as Windows claimed 97 percent of the P.C. perating-system market, software-is-everything/content-is-king became the market-making truth. His stubbornness here, his blindness, seemed like a business tragedy. Only for a bit of flexibility on Steve’s part, this could have been a Mac rather than a Windows world (ushering in an epoch of peace and happiness).

Except that one day in the near recent past everybody woke up and found out that while all the geniuses were blathering on about content this and content that, the media culture had, in fact, come to be dominated by machines. It’s Steve’s gadget-centric world which we just live in.

iPods, Razr phones, BlackBerrys, plasma screens, Xboxes, TiVos, laptops. Machines are the objects of desire. Machines are the habituating, behavior-changing things. Machines themselves are fascinating, life-enhancing, cool, sexy.

The medium is the message.

This article is so cool that I PDF’d a copy just in case the link disappears (and it almost certainly will). Many have written at length about Steve Jobs, but few offer an observation with a scope that encompasses everything this man is about (even the not-so-flattering stuff).

Collecting Pixar’s Stock Certificates

Monday, March 20th, 2006

I cam across this article on the craze that’s going on with people flocking to collect Pixar’s stock certificates. It’s reported that once Pixar and Disney have completed their merger, Pixar will stop issuing their colorful and playful stock certificates (which then becomes a collector’s item immediately).

This article has more details on the whole charade.

Here’s an image of the “actual” stock certificate:
Pixar stock certificate
(Image courtesy of WHACO.com)

via [MacDailyNews]

UPS — the Ultimate Cost Savings Machine

Sunday, March 19th, 2006

Murdza sent me a crazy interview with the CIO of UPS, Dave Barnes, about what UPS is doing to cut costs in optimizing its world wide shipping operations. If you are an efficiency-freak like Murdza, this is the video for you.

I think Murdza just found a new idol besides Steve “the God” Jobs.

Interview with UPS CIO, Dave Barnes

Mac Uptime

Sunday, March 19th, 2006

Murdza sent me this image the other day….

Mac: 200 days without reboot

That’s 200 days of Mac OSX running without a reboot. I am sure there are machines/OSes that have last longer than that. But it’s impressive nonetheless. I would never want to bet with someone if I had a Windows-based machine to be up and running for that kind of up time.

Murdza, don’t you ever apply OSX updates that Apple issues? They almost certainly require reboots!

A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy

Thursday, March 16th, 2006

Brian and I got into a pretty lengthy discussion about “limitations” certain governments placed on the idea of “Freedom of Speech” over Skype. This came about when some moron in Germany (or was it Austria?) got arrested for preaching that Holocaust never happened. Apparently it’s illegal to deny this very historical fact.

Brian thinks there shouldn’t be any limitations at all on freedom of speech. The government should have used abundance of true information to fight dis-information. While I agreed with most of his points, I thought maybe it’s a good idea of have some oversight to ensure certain “facts” will remain factual for futural generations (as opposed to having even a shred of doubt about the integrity of that “fact” ). Or else you end up with something like Japan to whom the Rape of Nanking never took place. And when enough people buy into the idea and gathers enough momentum, dis-information just might overtake the facts, and that very dis-information may become the “fact” that it just replaced.

In the context of social engineering and group dynamics, Clay Shirky thinks that certain amount of moderation is always a good idea in light of what programmers have learned from the early days of the Internet. He argues that when freedom of speech is truly “free”, online communities always fail and burn in chaos. There are certain kinds of behavioral traits in humans that will always surface. So in essence, there can probably never be true freedom of speech for as long as the humans are in charge of things. Without the rules of law, can civilized socieities stay civilized? Based on the findings of online forums Clay Shirky cited, the short answer is NO.

A Fabulous Studio

Thursday, March 16th, 2006

Jason sent me a totally awesome video*! It’d be wrong not to blog about it!

Some screenshots:

Music video from Jamiroquai

Music video from Jamiroquai

See the video.

The video was made by a studio called “Partizan“. There are lots of other stuff they made on their site. Here is another video I really enjoyed from Partizan.

* Thanks to Kaan for discovering the video.

My First Ajax Program

Thursday, March 16th, 2006

I finally got my fist Ajax program to work the way I wanted it to… It’s like getting my first PHP (or, Cocoa, or C++… etc*) program to do “Hello World” (only Ajax is slightly more complicated than simply doing echo "hello world" in PHP)… the excitement!

Now maybe I can finally solve a couple of the long standing problems I have been trying to crack with this project I have been working on…

Yay!

* I never really got anywhere with Cocoa, C++ or even Perl… never had to use them for anything; only if Neely can get me a freelance project to work with Cocoa or Objective-C, then I’ll probably have to do a crash course on it with a month… then my dream of being able to write apps for Mac OSX would be complete…

Growth of WiredAtom

Wednesday, March 15th, 2006

It just so happened that exactly three months ago today, I took a snapshot of the stats of this blog at the time. WiredAtom just broke 10,000 unique visitors since I installed the stat tracker. Three months later, it seems like the site has been consistently getting 10,000 hits a month.

Page stats as of March 15, 2006

I also found it odd that my arbitrary post on using the WordPress Random Header plugin is ranked higher than the official WordPress site! What the hell? My entry on insurance fraud is also ranked among top 5 results when “unethical doctor” is Googled! I am convinced that Google takes into account the “freshness” of a topic relevant to the keyword. I mean, there’s no fricking way I should be out ranking Wordpress on a plugin that it provides!

Destiny or Physics

Monday, March 13th, 2006

When science took over teaching as the primary method of education, so did a wave of reawakening in people’s approach to philosophy and religion. Instead of “blindly” believe that the God(s)*, more and more people turn to science for answers. For the longest time, the religious followers refuse to believe that “life” was just a fluke and that they are descendents of monkies (ahem, chimps; there’s a difference). They also believe that nothing ever happens by chance and that there’s a meaning for everything that happens. In other words, God(s) has/have a bigger plan.

True that belief may be. But science just scored another point in that arena to its favor. For a long time science could only go so far as to prove and predict how and why certain relationships work and don’t work in social dynamics. But now there’s a new research that shows how certain “fate” in friendships can be scientifically proven and quantified.

By comparing people to mobile particles randomly bouncing off each other, scientists have developed a new model for social networks. The model fits with empirical data to naturally reproduce the community structure, clustering and evolution of general acquaintances and even sexual contacts.

Applying a mathematical model to the social dynamics of people presents difficulties not involved with more physical – and perhaps more rational – applications. The many factors that influence an individual’s fate to meet an acquaintance and decide to become a friend are impossible to capture, but physicists have used techniques from physical systems to model social networks with near precision.

Maybe this is still too far fetch to definitively link “destinies” to physics. But it’s scary the kinds of things physics/pure mathematics can do**.

* If you are a Christian, you are only permitted to pray to ONE god, or else everything else can be sacred like how the Native Idians view the world.

** The “Game Theory” developed by John von Neumann and later improved upon by John Nash was developed using pure mathematics, not some philosophical or social dynamics theory. Just math!

via [Slashdot]

Object Permanence Takes Root

Friday, March 10th, 2006

The first clear sign that Bryan has fully developed the idea of object permanence was when he looked for Grace and I when something blocked his plain view of us. It’s so cute to see him tilt his head just a little to get a full view of us despite the object blocking the view. It’s just so rediculously cute to see his two little eyes peeping over the object! Hah!

Another new development is his accurate and firm grip on “things”. Anything. And he’s fast too (as I am sure this applies to all babies). If he sees something and wants it, the speed in which he goes at it is way faster than my reaction speed to catch him. It’s crazy. And this is all before he can crawl!

I fear for the day when he begins crawling at full speed.

On a similar note, Bryan can now easily take the pacifier out of his mouth, look at it, smile and put it right back. Facinating.

Fake Gmail Service

Friday, March 10th, 2006

I casually typed in just “gmail” into my url box the other day. But instead of the real Gmail, I got this:

Fake 'Made in China' Gmail

It’s a fake “Made in China” Gmail imposter. (gmail.cn)

I gotta tell you, the damn Communist Chinese are relentless in their pursuit of pirating, no matter what form, format or media. Interested in what this lame offer has in store, I signed up for a fake account:

And this is what I got:

Fake Chinese Gmail account

I hate myself for even bothering to “try”….

Losers.

Why Privatizing Public Services Is A Bad Idea

Thursday, March 9th, 2006

I know I said I didn’t want to get into why nationalized healthcare is a better idea, but I just think privatizing healthcare and education are just stupid ideas. Corporations exist for only one true purpose — to maximize shareholders values. Any first year business school student can tell you that in his sleep. And why is the Republican party so adamant in placing the two most important public facilities in the hands of private entities whose highest priority is to bring their shareholders most money possible? Sure, some companies do have a good conscience and are responsible to the greater good of the society, but guess what, those decisions are made only after sharesholder’s values are secured, never the other way around (because I think that could be borderline illegal and is against the very purpose of a corporation’s existance. Look it up. I guarantee you that if a company’s CEO purposely chooses to do good for the society but in the process lose a lot of money when he knows the other way around can make the company great profit, he will go to jail).

Many people insist that private schools consistently perform better than public schools. Yeah, NO SHIT. That’s because private schools get to choose who they want to accept into their exclusive club. Public schools have no choice because the law mandates they accept and educate anyone and everyone who wants to learn (even ones who don’t even want to be there). So you see how unfair the scores can look for the public schools in most cases. On the flip side, there are plenty of excellent public schools all over the United States that do far better than any of the private schools you can find. How does one explain that? And how does one explain all those public schools elsewhere in the world that crank out great students who can do just as well as students from private schools? In countries like Taiwan and Japan, private schools are for losers for can’t make it in the public schools (outcasts, drop outs, trouble makers). What does that say?

Placing children’s education in the hands of profit generating machines en mass can be a pretty bad idea. Let’s just for a moment imagine if all schools in the United States are privatized. What does each pupil look to the schools? Think about it…. Dollar signs. The United States has one of the highest per-pupil expenditures in the world. Private companies schools will only be too interested in getting that child for the Federal and State money s/he is attached to, not necessarily the well-being of the child. I am sure sophisticated laws, checks-n-balances, and all sorts of things can be implemented to make sure the child is doing well, but how does that differ from a well-run public school/school district where all those checks-n-balances are already in place mandated by the law? And what about the working conditions of the teachers and staff in private schools? From what I have researched, some are worse off than the public school teachers. Remember, those teachers are employees of corporations. And corporations want to maximize each employee’s time and resources to maximize the value for… you guessed it, the investors and shareholders.

I can go on forever on the topic of education, thanks to my previous job in the education sector. But I digress.

A similar arguement goes to the public healthcare system and the welfare system. Why is it that someone has to pay so much money each month into the private healthcare industry when that money could just as well go into a public healthcare fund and have a national healthcare system, much like Taiwan, Malaysia and almost all other industrialized countries? The latest Medicare fiasco under the Bush Administration is proof that privatized public healthcare just plain sucks. Who’s going to be looking out for the well beings of the senior citizens? They are often expensive to take care of when they get sick. And if we learned anything about the private companies, that is… you got it, they want to maximize value for their investors, not the senior citizens. So they’ll do as much as they can to cut corners, deny benefits and give them the run arounds to minimize expenditure (hence increasing company value).

Sure, sometimes government can be inefficient. And often social programs are huge budget holes. But some programs are worth losing that money for… Or, a better term should be, “worth the investment for.” When citizens can’t count on their most basic needs being met (the right to be educated and the right to receive quality low cost healthcare), how can the government count on them to be productive? In the case of the United States, if its government can stop spending those billions in Iraq, Afghanistan and all those efforts trying to bully other countries into their submission, maybe a lot more scholarships can be properly funded? Maybe a lot more schools woulnd’t be failing? Maybe senior citizens won’t have to decide between food and medicine? Maybe it ought to take care of its own citizens before it is out there telling others how to run their own damn government? And just maybe the United States will be respected again?

Dreams can be so cruel.